1. Decision-making factors:
All over the world farmers are rationally thinking people, since they have to deal with costs, profits and risk. A farm in the tropics and subtropics is a complex system, in which the household and the productive branches must be coordinated. Risk minimization is one of the most important strategies of farmers, both male and female, especially on smallholdings. Intervention assumes a good apriori understanding of the system.
2. Conditions of agriculture in the tropics:
The natural spatial conditions and thus the character of agriculture can fluctuate considerably within a short distance. In many locations in humid climatic zones the nutrient supply for the plants is a limiting factor, which is aggravated by the decline of fallowing and rapidly reducing humus content due to a more intensive soil preparation. The lack of a crop cover causes severe erosion set in motion by heavy rainfall. High weed growth requires an appreciable labour investment as the period of fallow is reduced. The work calender is relatively balanced out in the humid tropics because of the low seasonality. The crops (permanent and root crops) grown here are difficult to mechanize. Animal husbandry, fodder as well as the extra energy expended for clearing land, which is necessary for utilizing implements, all require a substantial investment
In the drier zones soil fertility is generally higher. The investment for clearing is less and weed invasion is less marked than in the humid tropics. The crops grown here can easily be mechanized. Since the yield is lower and frequently only one crop per year is harvested, a greater area must be cultivated. Also, work peaks occur for planting, due to the distinct seasonality of precipitation and the limitation of the growing season, which favour animal traction. If the duration of the vegetation period is too short, the introduction of draft-animal mechanization is no longer worthwhile since animals and implements are not used to capacity.
3. Transition from the hand hoe to the plow:
Farming systems undergo constant change, e.g. due to population expansion, alterations in the structure of land tenure and increased market access. Usually this leads to a higher land-use intensity, i.e. to a reduction of fallow. Shifting cultivation is optimal in respect to labour productivity and distribution, also in terms of the ecology. The soil is loose and weed invasion is minimal. Any mechanization measures would only be connected with an additional investment for thorough clearing and draft-animal husbandry. The labour investment increases with greater land-use intensity in the hand-hoe system, especially for weed control, and animal traction serves the purpose of heading off the declining labour productivity. The introduction of animal traction is therefore only beneficial after a certain level of land-use intensity has been attained. Animal traction is as a rule only introduced prior to this time point in regions where the input for clearing is low dry regions, grass savanna, flood plains) or where soil preparation is difficult with the hand hoe. An acceleration of mechanization also occurs when migrants bring along their experience with draft-animal techniques (e.g. in South Brazil).
4. Factors of production -land, labour and capital:
In the industrialized countries mechanization occurred when the production factor, labour, in comparison to land, was scarce and an increase of labour productivity was desired (replacement of labour with capital). In the sparsely settled, expansive agricultural areas of USA (savanna) there was a low supply of labour forces and due to the industrialization a purchasing power demand and thus sufficient capital available. An intensification (e.g. with the help of fertilizer or improved seed) occurred when the land became scarce. This was the case in the heavily populated countries such as Germany and Japan where the land area was small. Mechanization first happened in connection with the migration of many labourers to the industry.
Under the conditions of the vegetation of many tropical regions the labour productivity in the case of low land-use intensity cannot be increased by means of draft-animal mechanization. The necessary pre-conditions can first be created by a more intensive input of labour and capital, which is not possible for the existing farms, in order to satisfy the needs of a purchasing power demand and an increase of benefits. In general, both the purchasing power demand and the necessary capital is lacking, so that the development progresses more slowly. Therefore, animal traction will retain its significance for a long time to come.
5. Aims of draft-animal use:
Animal traction primarily serves the purpose of reducing work peaks by means of mechanizing work operations, expanding cropping areas, easing the work load or facilitating the tillage of heavy soils (e.g. in river bottoms). In general, mechanization initially takes place for the energy-intensive work operations of soil preparation and transportation. The more control a work operation requires (e.g. harvest), the higher the labour costs must be, in order that the purchase of a machine becomes worthwhile. At the beginning of the introduction of animal traction the animals are only used for a few work operations, so that the labour productivity in comparison to manual labour does not increase. Also the area performance generally does not increase; it can actually decline due to a reduction of mixed cropping. On the other hand, the yield can be increased because of the more frequent weed control, which is possible with mechanization. Greater intensity of draft-animal use, i.e. for further work operations, and especially hiring out of animals and implements increase the profitability substantially. The latter is only possible as long as their is a small number of draft-animal farms.
6. Status of animal traction:
Asia has the highest density of draft animals, where in the areas of concentration, e.g. Nepal and Bangladesh (with more than 100 animals per 100 ha of cropland), there is also a high population density. In Africa and South America figures for draft animals are generally lower, although in some zones an intensive use is recorded. In the Mediterranean countries of Africa and in many countries of South America draft animals are being displaced by tractors.
7. Constraints of draft-animal use:
Difficulties in the infrastructural sphere were particularly mentioned in the responses to our survey: veterinary services, loans, animal purchases, fodder and repair of the implements. Problems that cannot be solved in the short term are simply set aside. This is attributed to the fact that the responses originated from regions where animal traction has already been disseminated. The problems caused by the introduction of draft animals under the auspices of development cooperation endeavours, which are not suited to land-use intensity or the cropping system, are frequently ignored by the participating institutions. Draft-animal measures were generally considered unpopular in regions where they competed with motor mechanization.
8. Procurement of animals:
Regarding the selection of draft animals the potential of multiple application (e.g. meat, milk) is important, aside from availability, price, adaptiveness to a region, the requirements of the farm and the work to be carried out. Monofunctional use, as is the case for horses, is only worthwhile if the capacity of the animal is fully exploited. Oxen are primarily utilized for the purpose of soil preparation. Cows possess high demands in terms of husbandry and management, in order that the reproductive performance and milk production be maintained. The price of cattle depends upon the demand for meat. Donkeys are predominantly used in more arid regions, especially for transportation and to a lesser extent for easier tasks such as seeding and weed control. Horses and mules are utilized for all work operations.
9. Draft power:
The draft power and the performance of the animals is proportional to the weight of the animals. The draft-power requirement depends upon the soil conditions, the work operation and the type of implement. Generally, for horses and cattle 1/10 to 1/7 of the body weight is mentioned with a daily work time of 5 to 6 hours. Donkeys and mules achieve better results. Higher values are often recorded (up to 23 % of the weight). Standardized procedures for measuring draft power are lacking in any case, which could also assess draft capacity and the load duration of the animals (weight, nutritional condition) existing on the farms under normal operational conditions.
The potential of draft-animal use is predominantly independent of the size and weight of the locally available animals. More important is the adaptiveness to the local conditions, especially in consideration of the fodder and risk of disease. Furthermore, a critical constraint is the lack of suitable implements (e.g. various plow sizes) and methods of harnessing. Crossing small-framed indigenous breeds with larger exotic breeds for an increase of draft power is possible, but this has not been proven viable in some cases due to a lack of adaptation to the smallholding structures. The absolute lack of draft animals is no long-term limiting factor in regions where animal traction can effectively be implanted. Here various measures of assistance could accelerate the process.
Low animal performance as a result of their poor nutritional condition was mentioned in the survey in more than 50 % of the cases, especially after the fodder-scarce dry season at the beginning of the fieldwork period. The publications consulted also considered the main constraint of animal traction to be the poor feeding condition of the animals. In approximately half the cases exclusively grazing (natural pastures, fields with harvest residues) were mentioned; the remainder also supply additional fodder. Expenditures for purchasing fodder and the water supply for the animals receive more attention with increasing land-use intensity and dissemination of animal traction as well as aridity, meaning an increased load on family labour, especially the children. Primarily stall feeding, as for example with the intensive systems for the integration of animal husbandry known in cropping in Asia, does not exist at all. In comparison with these systems where already the limits of fodder supply have been reached, the provision of fodder can be considered as extensive in Africa and Latin America. Since here, nevertheless, the poor nutrition and the low performance are mentioned as constraints, the question still arises whether this bottleneck is also recognized by the farmers or if it is merely a problem at the level of specialists and technicians. In a survey on Malawi for example most of the farmers interviewed were of the opinion that the conditions of the "lean" oxen did not present a problem at the beginning of the fieldwork season.
11. Integration of animal husbandry into the cropping systems:
In approximately one-third of the cases in our survey stall-keeping occurs at night. Optimal fodder exploitation and the collection of dung, essential reasons for stall keeping, only are feasible to a limited extent. The utilization of manure is little developed and limited to plots and gardens near the farmyard. Moreover, the natural soil fertility and its restoration following fallow can still be relied on.
12. Training and duration of use:
In countries having a tradition of animal traction the managing of the teams takes place mainly by one person, while in regions where it has been more recently introduced 2 to 3 people are necessary. This can be essentially attributed to the intensity of the contact between man and animal. The training condition of the animals is all the better, the higher the annual duration of use and if work operations such as weed control and seeding, which require more precision from the animals, are mechanized. The older and more experienced the draft animals are, the better developed the overall draft potential and skill. Poorly trained animals which are used for a short duration require more control and thus more people to guide them when employed for pulling implements, thus reducing an increase in the labour productivity aimed for by the mechanization. A short working life of draft cattle can however be an advantage if there is a high demand for beef
13. Structure of the draft-animal farms:
In the regions having a more recent history of animal traction the draft-animal farms have an above average access to facilities, which enables them to produce an enormous capital investment in relation to the hand hoe operations. In countries with a considerable proportion of motor mechanization, on the other hand, the smallholders utilize animal traction. Animal traction is introduced initially by farms with large families, and motor mechanization by farms having more cropland. Animal traction usually leads to an expansion of the cropping area per farm. The maximum area worked per span depends, among other things, upon the length of the vegetation period. Depending upon the climate this can vary between 4 and 15 ha. Assuming the profitability limit for the use of tractors in rainfed cropping e.g. 35 ha in South Brazil, a gap of between 15 and 35 ha arises which can only be filled by hiring out tractors, if state subsidies are excluded. According to the survey the average cropping area in the draft-animal regions lies between 2 and 5 ha in 40 % of the cases and the plots between 0.2 and 0.4 ha by 40 %.
Only certain crops are suited for mechanization. Permanent crops and perennials play a subordinate role in terms of animal traction. Most annual crops can easily be mechanized. Crops that are usually broadcasted, such as wheat and barley, only require draft animals for soil preparation, while for maize, beans, sorghum, cotton or groundnut seeding and weed control can also be simply mechanized. Since animal traction frequently is connected with the introduction of more labour- intensive cash crops, a considerable surplus labour input is required at harvest time. Only harvesting of groundnuts is accomplished with draft-animal implements. Mowing of grain and digging of tubers, which was done by draft animal in earlier industrialized countries, is conducted exclusively manually. Due to the possibility of mechanizing the harvest with the combine harvester, for certain crops such as wheat and soybeans it is more advantageous to produce them in Brazil on large farms, while maize and beans are primarily grown on smaller farms. Mixed cropping, which can be done in rows, allows the mechanization of most work operations as soil preparation, seeding and weed control. However, the share of mixed cropping is declining, since it is easier to work with the cultivator, or to synchronize the application of fertilizer and herbicides on the crops. Mound crops cannot be mechanized.
15. Labour distribution:
Mechanization removes or increases the burden on men, women and children to a varying extent. Changes in the investment for the individual work operations have a direct effect on the remaining work. Thus, the mechanization of the soil preparation transfers the work peaks to the weed control and harvest, especially if the cropping area is being expanded. Part of the work can be accomplished by means of placing a greater load on the family members or a displacement to seasonal workers. As long as some work operations are not mechanized animal traction can lead to a higher demand for hired labour, especially seasonal workers. In general, draft-animal work is carried out by the men. The danger exists that they improve their economic position over against the women.
16. Work operations:
Soil preparation, followed by transportation, weed control and seeding represent on the average the largest share of work by draft animals, in this order. Clearing, harvesting and other work operations, on the other hand, are of minimal importance. There is an absence of soil preparation exclusively in a few regions where no-tillage is practised as in Senegal. Only when a greater distribution of animal traction occurs, are the weed control and seeding operations conducted with animal-drawn implements. The introduction of row cropping necessary for this purpose appears to present no great long-term hindrance, as it usually takes place to make weed control easier. Weed control is carried out much more frequently with animal traction than seeding. Seeding with the seeder is no prerequisite for working with a cultivator. Nevertheless, in spite of the considerable potential for an increase of the labour productivity, a relatively greater share of 30 % of the cases in our survey conducted weed control exclusively manually.
Seeding is a work peak in regions having a shorter vegetation period. This can only be done with higher investments and demands on manufacturing, maintenance and repair. For this reason it is only undertaken in one-third of the regions investigated, mostly only by a smaller share of the farms. Seeders are utilized where the overall technical level has reached a high niveau, such as in Brazil, or where money flows into the farms from earned wages and labour resources are scarce, as in southern Africa. They are also common where the vegetation period is short and the crops must be planted as quickly as possible, such as in Senegal or Mali. Animal traction is widespread in these regions. In the Andes and most African countries draft-animal implements are not employed for seeding, even if the proportion of animal traction is high.
The mechanization of the harvesting process depends directly upon the amount of labour costs and is first an advantage when the wages are high. Often previous work operations are not mechanized due to bottlenecks during harvesting. Soil preparation and transportation are the essential draft-animal tasks in the initial stages of animal traction where low land-use intensity occurs. In one - quarter of the cases however transportation is not carried out with draft animals, particularly in the Andes countries and Ethiopia, where animal traction has a tradition and the ard is common. Here, draft-animal use appears to have stagnated on the level of own manufacturing by the farmers. The ard is also only partially used for breaking furrows before seeding and weed control. This is partially, for example in Ethiopia, due to soils that are difficult to cultivate (Vertisols) and the crops: teff, the main staple crop is broadcasted. In many regions motor mechanization replaces animal traction initially in regard to soil preparation, followed by seeding, according to our experience.
17. General features of the implements:
Low weight is of particular importance if the fields are not easily accessible, since the implements are carried there in this case. With regard to manoeuvering, especially on slopes, a light construction is an advantage. A lack of adjustable handles leads to the imbalanced load on the farmer. The design and maintenance often presents new problems, e.g. due to bolts which were formerly unknown, the necessity of special tools, assuring spare-part supplies and the difficulty to find distinct names for the parts, especially in regions having several languages. (We also encountered problems in translating the questionnaire into four languages.)
The support wheels, especially on the plows, often cause trouble. The highest demands placed on the manufacturing and maintenance are the rotating parts, which are mostly found on seeders.
18. Field preparation:
In tropical or subtropical humid areas the implements must often work on fields having a great deal of organic matter (growth of fallow, weeds, harvest residues), for which they are poorly suited. To date only the knife roller is utilized, which chops vegetation and leaves a mulch layer.
19. Soil preparation:
The mechanization of soil preparation alone does not bring any quality gain for the work result, in comparison to the hand hoe. Generally, differing points of view are seen regarding the advantages and disadvantages of soil preparation, which are in part attributed to the various natural endowments. Soil preparation, specially plowing, creates coarse pores, which are important for the root growth. The medium and fine pores determining the moisture retention capacity can only be created biologically or physically by means of swelling and shrinking. Loosening the soil makes sense if compaction has occurred, but this does not have a sustainable effect. Disadvantageous is the fact that the decomposition of organic substance is accelerated by intensive soil preparation and moisture loss ensues.
The yield of the individual crops reacts differently to soil preparation. Soil preparation can achieve higher yields and a reduction of erosion by means of an increase of the infiltration rate, wherever weakly structured soils tend to compaction and crusting, as is the case in most of Senegal. However, the farmers here prefer minimal soil tillage with a chisel plow or no-tillage in unprepared soil due to the short vegetation period. On the other hand, in the humid tropics where a constant covering of the soil with mulch would in principle be possible and necessary in view of the erosion effect of the rainfall, the mouldboard plow is used as a soil preparation implement because it achieves better weed control, among other things. In the transitional zones between semiarid and subhumid climates ridging is frequently used, especially for management of the moisture supply.
The ard is one of the most widely distributed implements. It is known for its superficial, non-turning operation and is adapted to the conditions in arid areas as well as difficult soils such as Vertisols because of the varying local designs. It does not leave a clean field, so that the use of further implements is problematic. Often the mobilization of subsequent implements is disregarded for economic or cropping reasons.
The ridger is used for soil preparation and building up ridges. Frequently, it is the only draft-animal implement used in regions having traditional ridged cropping. It achieves a high area performance.
22. Chisel plow:
The chisel plow is one of a series of soil preparation implements that does not turn the soil. In part, they are utilized in the identical form as the cultivator for weed control. They are preferred in semiarid regions and the dry zones of a semiarid/semihumid climate having light soils. Here they achieve a high area performance. In wetter regions implements with a broader tool are primarily used for weed control (example: bico de pato, fuador).
The harrow is only widespread in some areas where a high land-use intensity is found. Where it is frequently used, seeders are also common. It is appropriate for working in seed. Otherwise, it is seldom utilized. Disadvantages are the additional work operation which promotes erosion due to the too fine seedbed preparation, the clogging of organic matter as well as obstacles and sticking of heavy soils.
24. Mouldboard plow:
The mouldboard plow turns the soil and leaves a cleaner seedbed than the ard or chisel plow. Its decisive advantage is the applicability for weed-control purposes. The disadvantage is the intensive soil preparation, especially where the decomposition of organic matter and the moisture loss from evaporation has been accelerated too much. The most common design is the single-wheel plow with the support wheel. The gallows plow and the frame plow have hardly found acceptance. The most usual design is the conventional type, although it can only turn the soil to one side and is therefore inappropriate for slopes. The reversible plow is seldom utilized, despite its advantages on the slope and short plots. Turnwrest plows are the most commonly used reversible plow. According to the survey they are found particularly in Brazil. The conventional plow is generally cheaper and lighter, can achieve greater working width due to the better designed mouldboard shape and is less susceptible to clogging. In the regions investigated it achieved a higher area performance than the reversible plow. Problems are encountered with the rapid abrasion of some parts of the mouldboard plow. The share normally only last for ca. 5 ha equivalent to one working season.
25. Rotary implements:
The disk plow is not utilized in the regions investigated, and the disk harrow only to a limited extent despite its suitability for working in organic matter. It is available from several farm machinery manufacturers in Brazil, the only location where its use was mentioned. Problematic are its considerable weight and the high price.
The transition to sowing with draft-animal implements increases the area performance, improves the depositing of seed, facilitates the work where high seed density occurs and serves to maintain seeding correctly in the rows. The precision of depositing seed can also increase the area productivity and thus is considered to be a intensification measure that is particularly advantageous where there is a scarcity of cropland. The saving of seed by means of exact seed depositing is especially economical for expensive seed. It must be qualitatively said though that seeding is generally not a work peak and the increase of labour productivity is mostly achieved with handoperated seeders such as the popular jab planter in Brazil, especially for small cropping areas.
Seeding can in principle take place by broadcasting, dibbling or sowing in rows. In the regions investigated only draft-animal seeders for furrow seeding are being used, usually precision seeders especially developed for the sowing of a particular cash crop. To exploit the capacity of the seeder to the full however the implements must be applied to other crops, which they cannot sow optimally. Many seeders are also designed to spread fertilizer. In Brazil additional fertilizer applicators are utilized in some cases. Multi-row seeders and planters are not employed according to our survey. For the application on ridged crops no implements exist to date. High investment costs and a poor functioning due to technical problems with the seeders or inappropriate conditions (unsuitable soil, topography, insufficient seedbed preparation, obstacles) render the acceptance more difficult. Under these conditions furrow breakers facilitate the use of seeders.
27. Weed control:
Depending upon the climate, weed control is one of the most intensive work operations. It should begin as early as possible during the field work season, and should be as superficial as possible. For the farmer at this time the field is still "clean" however. Often it is reported that the farmers carried out the weed control very late in the season. Traditionally this occurred with the hand hoe, and the weeds were often left to grow so that they could simply be pulled by hand during the same operation. This procedure has been retained with work done by cultivators, which then leads to clogging. Especially during the introductory phase the poor training condition of the animals hinders the use of cultivators due to the risk of damage to the plants, which would change if animals were utilized more often. One-to five-share cultivators are employed for weed control. Ideally, the adjustment of the working width is done by a lever with multi-share implements, and bolts must often be loosened in order to alter the hoeing tools.
Single-share implements which are more sturdy than the multi-share types are often utilized inBrazil. They are more efficient for close row spacing and where a great deal of organic matter remains on the fields. On the other hand, the effect is poorer, especially since they can causedamage to the roots of the crops. Five-share cultivators are less widely distributed. Light multipurpose toolbars are more prevalent in the semihumid/semiarid regions of West Africa. Ridgers are utilized for weed control in regions where ridged cropping is more popular. In ard-plow areas this work operation is normally done by hand, and less often by the ard.
28. Comparison of the case studies Togo, Senegal and Paran (South Brazil):
Animal traction differs in the three case studies with respect to its introduction and dissemination.
In Paran draft-animal techniques accompanied the European settlers; in parallel a close network of artisans was created. Numerous farm machinery manufacturers have a wide array of implements on offer. Due to the already existing tradition animal traction should have already become widespread with a low land-use intensity. The dissemination of soil-preparation implements especially adapted to these conditions, such as the fuador in areas settled by Germans and Italians, leads one to this conclusion. Today, a wide array of implements is utilized in Paran. The reversible plow is primarily used for soil preparation. Draft animals are employed on 56 % of the farms, in 26 % in combination with tractors (mixed mechanization); only 12 % of the farms are equipped with own tractors. Because of the wide distribution of motorization (Paran: 11.76 tractors per 1000 inhabitants) draft-animal techniques in the meantime are manly limited to smallholdings, which work in areas with poor topography or shallow soils in many cases. These facts combined with the limited possibilities for investment reduce the potential for the further development of animal traction and the associated implements.
In spite of the tradition of animal traction in Paran and the high technical level in Brazil the seeder therefore is not commonly found on most of the farms. Tractors are hardly used in West Africa (0.12 tractors per 1000 inhabitants). The propounded tractorization (which failed in the end) following the second world war was the greatest hindrance for animal traction. It has received a priority position in recent years. The introduction is primarily promoted by development aid schemes; partially it was not recognized that mechanization can only be an advantage after a certain stage of development of the farm system has been reached. In the drier zones of the semihumid/semiarid climate no-tillage or a superficial soil preparation is practised due to the short vegetation period in order to complete the planting as rapidly as possible, as is done in most of Senegal. Here, primarily seeders and chisel plows are utilized. In the bordering wetter zones ridging is frequently found and the use of the ridger, also for soil preparation, as in northern Togo and Casamance in the south of Senegal. In wetter climates the plow is prevalent where animal traction is not widely distributed, as in the Centrale region in Togo.
While the implement offerings in Paran are distributed by private farm machinery manufacturers, state companies are delegated with this task in West Africa. In Togo the implements are delivered by UPROMA, in Senegal by SISMAR, which was first partially privatized in the 1980s. The farmers were forced to purchase implement packages in the context of loan contracts, whereby some e.g. the plow body or the harrow where not even used. While an artisanal system was able to develop in Senegal to ensure the repair of implements despite constraints in spare-part supplies and acquisition of materials, in Togo this was essentially hindered by a centrally managed spare-part system. On the other hand, material procurement is not difficult for the artisans in Paran, but they cannot prefinance it.
The progress of animal traction in the countries of the Third World will proceed differently than in Europe or North America because of the developments and world-wide introduction of motor mechanization. While in some regions (e.g. Centrale region in Togo) animal traction is still in the introductory phase, in other areas (e.g. Paran) the transition from draft-animal use to motor mechanization is occurring; in most cases the four-wheel tractor is purchased. Only in certain situations is the two-wheel tractor interesting. The transition to motor mechanization is limited to flat or slightly sloped fields. Thus, draft-animal activities are shifted to the unfavourable steeper sloping terrain. The transition to motor mechanization is generally occurring initially for soil preparation, and according to our experience later also with seeding. Frequently mixed mechanization is found with simultaneous utilization of both animals and tractors. The employment of seeders currently represents the highest stage of development of animal traction in South America and Africa from the technical and economic point of view. Limitations result for the further development of draft-animal implements due to the low volume of investment of non-motorized farms, unfavourable natural spatial conditions such as the topography, the shallow soils and the increasing tendency to conduct soil preparation with implements pulled by tractors.
The design of many implements originated from the colonial period. One approach could be the further development of already introduced implements. For this purpose a close cooperation must take place between the farmers and the artisans in order to incorporate their experience and ideas. This applies especially where the implements are being made by hand, which is however no longer possible in some regions for the ard due to a lack of wood. Considering research, the application of recent design principles and modern materials in closer connection with the farmers, artisans (who must be able to work with these new innovations) and farm machinery manufacturers could be explored and impulses provided for a further development of the implements. Above all, practice-related tests should be carried out with implements from various countries in order to make the best possible solutions available to the respective regional conditions.
In consideration of these developments it must be ascertained whether manufacturing is interesting at all for the industry, given the expected batch numbers. A significant aspect appears to be the meagre hope of the industry for any future of animal traction. In Brazil, the interest of the farm machinery manufacturers for innovations is also very slight., Moreover, already existing techniques are mainly being copied due to the lack of an effective patent law. Another aspect is the small amount of promotion for artisans. In three of the countries investigated they do not receive the support required for their important task. This applies especially to further training and material procurement. Most of the animals are purchased on credit. Thus, the further development of animal traction is decisively dependent upon the agricultural policies and their impact on prices of agricultural products, the allocation of loans and, in the long term, the distribution of land.
ACARESC: Associaao de Crdito e Assistncia Rural de Santa Catarina, Florianpolis, Brazil
ACARPA: Associaao de Crdito e Assistncia Rural do Paran, Curitiba; now called: EMATERPR
APAC: Associaao de Produtores Autnomos da Cidade e do Campo; Sao Joao de Meriti, Brazil
ASSESOAR: Associaao de Estudos, Orientaao e Assistncia Rural, Francisco Beltrao, Brazil
AT: Animal traction
CEC: Cation exchange capacity
CEEMAT: Centre d'Etudes et d'Exprimentation du Machinisme Agricole Tropical, Montpellier, France
CFA: Comunaut Financire Africaine
CIRAD: Dpartement du Centre de Coopration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Dveloppement,Montpellier, France
CPATSA: Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuria do Trpico Semi-Arido, Petrolina, Brazil
CPPP/EMPASC: Centro de Pesquisas para Pequenas Propriedades (Empresa Catarinense de Pesquisa Agropecuria),Chapec, Brazil
DED: Deutscher Entwicklungsdienst, Berlin (West); German Volunteer Service
EMATER -PR: Empresa de Assistncia Tcnica e Extensao Rural, Curitiba, Brazil
EMBRAPA: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuria, Braslia, Brazil
EMBRATER: Empresa Brasileira de Assistncia Tcnica e Extensao Rural, Braslia, Brazil
FAC: Font d'Aide et de Coopration, France
FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
FRG: Federal Republic of Germany
FS: French Soil Classification System
IAC: Instituto Agronmico de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
IAPAR: Fundaao Instituto Agronmico do Paran, Londrina, Brazil
IBGE: Fundaao Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
ICRISAT: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Niamey, Niger
IITA: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria
IPAT: Interdiciplinary Group for Appropriate Technology, Technical University of Berlin (West)
ISRA: Institut Sngalais de Recherche Agonomique, Dakar, Senegal
LLCD: Least Developed Countries
MOT: Motorized mechanization
mt: metric ton
IORSTOM: Institut Franais de Recherche Scientifique pour le Dveloppement en Coopration, Paris, France
PES: Division de la Programmation, de l'Evaluations et des Statistiques du PROPTA, Togo
PROPTA: Projet pour la Promotion de la Traction Animale, Togo
R Value: Measurement for land-use intensity, directly proportional to time of fallow and utilization of the field
SEMA: Secteur de Modernisation Agricole, Senegal
SISMAR: Socit Industrielle Sahlienne de Mcaniques, de Matriels Agricoles et de Reprsentations, Dakar,Senegal
SNLCS: Servio Nacional de Levantamento e Conservaao de Solos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
SODEFITEX: Socit de Dveloppement des Fibres Textiles, Senegal
SOTOCO: Societ Togolaise de Coton, Togo
STED: Societ Togolaise d'Etude et de Dveloppement, Togo
TIRDEP: Tanga Integrated Rural Development Programme, Tanga, Tanzania
TU Berlin: Technical University of Berlin (West)
UK: United Kingdom
UPROMA: Unit de Production de Matriel Agricole, Kara, Togo
USST: U.S. Soil Taxonomy: U.S. American Soil Classification System
The brand names of the draft animal implements are generally not listed here.
ACARPA (1986): Diagnstico da situaao dos ferreiros. (1-2), Ponta Grossa, Brazil (unpublished)
ALEXANDRATOS, N.; BRUINSMA, J., et al. (1982): Power inputs from labour, draught animals and machines in the agriculture of the developing countries. In: European Review of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 9 (2): 127-155
ALMANAQUE ABRIL '87 (1986): Editora Abril, Sao Paulo, Brazil
ALMANAQUE ABRIL '89 (1988): Editora Abril, Sao Paulo, Brazil
ALMEIDA, F.S.; RODRIGUES, B.N.; OLIVEIRA, V.F. (1983): Contrle de plantas daninhas na cultura do feijao no Estado do Paran. Circular No.32, IAPAR, Londrina, Brazil
AMEGBETO, K. N. (1988): Etude Comparative de Rentabilit de la Culture Manuelle et de la Culture Attele en Milieu Rurale dans les Zones de Broukou et de Kambole au Togo. Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction forAgricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
ARMON, M.; LAL, R. (1979): Soil conditions and tillage systems in the tropics. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Tillage Research Organization, Hohenheim, FRG
ANDREWS, D.J.; KASSAM, A.H. (1977): The importance of multiple cropping in increasing world food supplies. In:Multiple Cropping. ASA Special Publication Number 27, Madison, USA
APO (1983): Farm Mechanization in Asia. Asian Productivity Organization (APO), Tokyo, Japan
ARAUJO, A.G. (1988a): Personal information
ARAUJO, A.G. (1988b): Preparo do solo com traao animal. Curso de mecanizaao e manejo de solos de baixa aptidao agrcola no Paran. Ponta Grossa, Brazil (unpublished)
ASHBURNER, J.; YABILAN, M. (1988): The Development of Animal Traction Equipment adapted to the Agricultural Production practised in the Rainfed Areas of the Republic of Niger. Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
BECKER, H. (1987): Entwicklung und Erprobung einer Unkrautwalze. Abschlubericht an die GTZ, Gieen, FRG (unpublished)
BERTOL, O; WAGNER, O. (1987): A knife roller or chopping roller. ILEIA-Newsletter, Vol.3 No.1, Leusden, The Netherlands
BERTONI, J.; PASTANA, F.I.; LOMBARDI NETO, F.; BENATTI JR., R. (1972): Conclusoes gerais das pesquisas sobre conservaao do solo no Instituto Agronmico. Circular No. 20, 56p., Instituto Agronmico do Estado de Sao Paulo, Campinas, Brazil
BONNET, B.; GUIBERT, B.; et al. (1988): Conduite, gestion des carrires et valorisation des boeufs de trait en zones cotonire. Economie de la Mcanisation en Rgion Chaude. CIRAD/MESRU, 12-16 Sep. 1988, Montpellier, France
BORDET, D.; LHOSTE, P.; LE MOIGNE, M.; LE THIEC, G. (1988): La Traction Animale en Afrique Francophone. Rapport Final. CEEMAT, Antony, France
BOSSI, M. T. (1982): Evaluation Couts/Avantages de la Culture Attele dans les Zones d'Action du Projet Nord-Togo. Ministre du Plan et de la Rforme Administrative, Programme d'Amenagement dans le Nord-Togo; Kara, Togo
BRUCHHAUS, E.M. (1984): Von der Buerin zur Hilfskraft? In: Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit, No. 6/84, FRG
CAESAR, K. (1986): Einfhrung in den tropischen und subtropischen Pflanzenbau. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., FRG
Calcagnotto, G. (1985): Agrarpolitik und Internationalisierung
des brasilianischen Agrarsektors. In:
Lateinamerika. Analysen -Daten -Dokumentation. Inst. f. Iberoamerika-Kunde, Hamburg, FRG
CASAO JUNIOR, R. (1987): Uso da traao animal na agricultura. 3°. Encontro Brasileiro de Agricultura Alternativa, 12-17 April, Cuiab, Brazil (unpublished)
CASAO JUNIOR, R. (1988a): Personal information
CASAO JUNIOR, R. (1988b): Estudos sobre manejo de solos de baixa aptidao agrcola no Paran. Curso de mecanizaao e manejo de solos de baixa aptidao agrcola no Paran. Londrina, Brazil (unpublished)
CASAO JUNIOR, R.; SIQUEIRA, R.; YAMAOKA, R.S.; ARAUJO, A.G.; FIGUEIREDO, P.R.A. (1987): Estudo e caracteri zaao de semeadoras-adubadoras traao animal no Paran. Inf. da pesq. No.77, IAPAR, Londrina, Brazil
CASAO JUNIOR, R.; SIQUEIRA, R.; YAMAOKA, R.S.; ARAUJO, A.G.; FIGUEIREDO, P.R.A. (1988): Adaptaao e desenvolvimento do arado traao animal "Tamandu-IAPAR". Circular No.54, IAPAR, Londrina, Brazil
CHARREAU, C. (1972): Problmes poss par l'utilisation agricole des sols tropicaux par des cultures annuelles.Agron. Tropicale 27: 905-929
CHARREAU, C. (1974): Soils of Tropical Dry and Dry-Wet Climatic Areas of West Africa and their Use and Management. A series of lectures presented at Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
CHOPART, J.L. (1981): Le travail du sol au Sngal. Analyse des contraintes techniques et propositions actuelles de la recherche. IRAT, 36p, Nogent sur Marne, France
CIRAD (1988): Economie Rurale en Zone de Savane. Actes du 7. sminaire d'conomie et sociologies rurales, 15-19 Sep. 1986, Montpellier, France
CNEEMA (1981): Les matriels de labour et de prparation du sol. Antony, France
COELHO, W. (1988): Personal information
COPESTAKE, P.G.; TINKER, D.; ZUNIGA, A (1988): A simple jab-planter for sowing maize and beans. In:Appropriate Technology, Vol.15, No.3
DAVID, A. (1988): Personal information
DECKEN, T.v.d. (1989): Personal information
DECKEN, T.v.d.; PANA (1987): Compte Rendu de la Tourne Effectue dans la Rgion Centrale du 24 au 28 aot 1987. PROPTA; Atakpame, Togo
DEHN, C.J. (1981): Der Einflu von Bodenbearbeitungsmanahmen auf die Bodenfruchtbarkeit in den Tropen.Diplomarbeit, Inst. f. Trop. u. Subtrop. Pflanzenb., Universitt Gttingen, FRG
DENCKER, (1961): Handbuch der Landwirtschaft. Parey Verlag, Hamburg, FRG und Berlin (West)
DERAL (1986): Prognstico Agrcola - Safra 1986/87. Secretaria de Estado da Agricultura, Curitiba, Brazil
DERPSCH, R.; ROTH, C.H.; SIDIRAS, N.; KPKE, U (1988): Erosionsbekmpfung in Paran, Brasilien: Mulchsysteme,Direktsaat und konservierende Bodenbearbeitung. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
DOHRMANN, R. (1988): Der Esel -Nutzung und Bedeutung in den
Tropen und Subtropen. TU Berlin, Inst. f.Tierproduktion, Diplomarbeit, Berlin
DOSSA, D. (1988): Personal information
EICHHORN, H. (1985): Landtechnik. Ulmer-Verlag, Stuttgart, FRG
ELHIMDY, B.; CHICHE, J. (1988): Traction animale au Maroc. Approche a la rentabilit dans les petites exploitations (Cas de Tadla). Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
EMBRATER (1985): Projeto mecanizaao traao animal na regiao Sul. Reuniao tcnica de avaliaao.Braslia, Brazil (unpublished)
EMBRATER (1986a): Traao animal nas regioes Sudeste e Centro-Oeste. Braslia, Brazil
EMBRATER (1986b): Catlogo de fabricantes. Mquinas e implementos agrcolas. Braslia, Brazil
ERBACH, D.C.; LOVELY, W.G. (1977): Machinery Adaptions for Multiple Cropping. In: Multiple Cropping. ASA, Special Publication Number 27, Madison, USA
ESTLER, M.; KNITTEL, H.; ZELTNER, E. (1984): Bodenbearbeitung aktuell. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., FRG
FABRY, R. (1989): Personal information
FABRY, R. 1990): Mechanisierung der kleinbuerlichen Weizenproduktion. Einsatzmglichkeit und Grenzen der Zugtieranspannung in Paran/Brasilien. Diplomarbeit, Inst. fr Betriebs-und Standortkonomie, TU Berlin, Berlin (West)
FALL, A. (1985): Situation actuelle sur l'environnement et l'utilisation du parc de matriels de culture attele en Basse Casamance. ISRA, Dakar, Senegal
FALL, A.; NDIAME, F. (1988a): La mcanisation de la riziculture en Basse-Casamance. Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
FALL, A.; NDIAME, F. (1988b): Roles actuels et potentiels des forgerons traditionnels dans la maintenance du matriel agricole en Basse-Casamance. Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
FAO (1977): Farming with animal power. Economic and Social Development Series No. 3/14, Rome, Italy
FAO (1988): Production Yearbook 1987. Vol. 41, Rome, Italy
FASOLO, P.J.; HOCHMLLER, D.P.; CARVALHO, A.P.; CARDOSO, A.;
RAUEN, M.; POTTER,
R.O. (1986): Guia para identificaao dos principais solos do Estado do Paran. Documentos 10, EMBRAPA-SNLCS, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
FAURE, G.; DJANGI, K. (1988a): Study of Village Land and Monitoring of Farms in Togo. In: CIRAD, 1988: Economie Rurale en Zone de Savane. Actes du 7. sminaire d'conomie et sociologies rurales, 15-19 Sep. 1986, Montpellier, France
FAURE, G.; DJANGI, K. (1988b): L'Expansion de la Culture Attele dans la Rgion des Savanes au Togo. Facteur de Progrs Social sans Progrs Economique. Economie de la Mcanisation en Rgion Chaude. CIRAD/MESRU, 12-16 Sep. 1988, Montpellier, France
FAURE, P. (1976/77): Occupation du Sol, d'aprs photos ariennes. In: CIRAD, 1988: Economie Rurale en Zone de Savane. Actes du 7. sminaire d'conomie et sociologies rurales, 15-19 Sep. 1986, Montpellier, France
FAYE, A.; NIANG, L.; SARR, D.Y.; THIAM, A. (1986). Etude monographique de la communaut rurale de Kaymor. Doc. de Travail 86-4, ISRA, Dakar, Senegal
FIGUEIREDO, P.R.A. (1988): Personal information
FIGUEIREDO, P.R.A.; ARAUJO, A.G.; CASA ~O JUNIOR, R.; YAMAOKA, R.S.; SIQUEIRA, R. (1986): Estudo e caracteri zaao de implementos de preparo primrio traao animal em solo Litlico Eutrfico, com baixa aptidao agrcola. XV Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Agrcola 8-12/7/1986, Sao Paulo, Brazil
FRANZ, G. (1969): Die Geschichte der Landtechnik im 20. Jahrhundert. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., FRG
FREIRE, C. (1988): Personal information
FRYREAR, D.W. (1984): Soil cover and wind erosion. TRANSACTIONS of the ASAE 27 (2): 445-448
FUENTES, R.L. (1984): Caracterizaao da estrutura de produao agropecuria do Estado do Paran. Dissertaao de mestrado, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, Brazil
FUENTES, R.L. (1988): Personal information
GILL, W.R.; VANDEN BERG, G.E. (1968): Soil Dynamics in Tillage and Traction. Agriculture Handbook No.316; US Dept. of Agric., Washington D.C., USA
GOE, M.R. (1987): Animal traction on smallholder farms in the Ethiopian Highlands. Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 48, No 2
GROSSMANN, M. (1986): Lesothos Agrarmechanisierung am Scheideweg? Probleme und Perspektiven der Ochsenanspan nung in Lesotho. Diplomarbeit, Universitt Hohenheim, Stuttgart, FRG
GRUBBE, P. (1987): Dritte Welt, was ist das? Peter Hammer Verlag, Wuppertal, FRG
GRYSEELS, G.; ABIYE ASTATKE; ANDERSON, F.M.; GETACHEW ASSEMENEW (1984): The Use of single Oxen for Crop Cultivation in Ethiopia. In: ILCA Bulletin No.18, April 1984
GUTSCHE, K. (1989): Personal information
HADLICH, E. (1988): Personal information
HAEFS, H. (ed.) (1988): Der Fischer Weltalmanach 1989. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., FRG
HARRIS, M. (1988): Wohlgeschmack und Widerwillen -Die Rtsel der Nahrungstabus. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, FRG
HARTMANS; E.H.; KUILE, C.H.H.t. (1983): IITA's views on current and future trends in tillage in the humid and subhumid tropics. Fifth Session of the FAO Panel of Experts on Agricultural Mechanization, 20-22.4.83, Rome, Italy.
HAVARD, M. (1985): Principales caractristiques et contraintes
de gestion du parc matriels de culture attele au Sngal. Machinisme Agricole
Tropical, N° 91, S. 19-24, CEEMAT, Antony, France
HAVARD, M. (1987a): Le parc de matriels de culture attele et les possibilits de sa maintenance dans le dpartement de Fatick. Doc. de Travail 87-6, ISRA, Dakar, Senegal
HAVARD, M. (1987b): Le parc de matriels de culture attele et les possibilits de sa maintenance dans le dpartement de Nioro. Doc. de Travail 87-3, ISRA, Dakar, Senegal
HAVARD, M. (1988a): Les conclusions des exprimentations (1950 -1985) sur le semis en culture attele des principales espces cultives. In: Machinisme Agricole Tropical, No.101, CEEMAT, Antony, France
HAVARD, M. (1988b): L'application au bassin arachidier d'une mthode simple de suivi et d'valuation de la culture attele. ISRA, Dakar, Senegal
HERLEMANN, H. (1961): Grundlagen der Agrarpolitik. Verlag Franz Vahlen GmbH, Berlin (West) und Frankfurt a.M., FRG
HOPFEN, H.J. (1969): Farm implements for Arid and Tropical Regions. FAO, Rome, Italy
HURTIENNE, T.; RAMALHO, L. (1989): Die Wirtschaftsentwicklung. In: HART, K.; RAMALHO, L. (eds.): Brasilien. VSA-Verlag, Hamburg, FRG
IAPAR (1978): Cartas climticas bsicas do Estado do Paran. Londrina, Brazil
IAPAR (1988): Adaptaao e desenvolvimento do arado de aiveca a traao animal. Circular No 54, Londrina, Brazil
IBGE (1975): Censo Agropecuario Brasil, VII Recenseamento Geral 1970, Nacional. Vol. III, Rio de Janeiro,Brazil
IBGE (1984): Censo Agropecuario Brasil, IX Recenseamento Geral do Brasil 1980. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
IBGE (1986): Sinopse preliminar do censo agropecurio -Paran. Censos econmicos -1985. Brazil (unpublished)
IPARDES (1985): A sobrevivncia da pequena produao e a oferta de alimentos no Paran -uma anlise integrada. Vol.1, Curitiba, Brazil
ISRA; CIRAD; FAC (1986): Recherche et Developpement Agricole. Les Units Exprimentales du Sngal.Montpellier, France
JACOBEIT, W. (1969): Tierische Anspannung. In: FRANZ, G. (1969): Die Geschichte der Landtechnik im 20.Jahrhundert. DLG -Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., FRG
JAEGER, R. (1988): Le Dveloppment Rcent de la Traction Bovine au Burundi. Economie de la Mcanisation en Rgion Chaude. CIRAD/MESRU, 12-16 Sep. 1988, Montpellier, France
KIRK, M. (1987): Technologiewahl in der Landwirtschaft Kameruns. Probleme der Ausbreitung von Ochsenanspannung in kleinbuerlichen Betriebssystemen. Alano Verlag, Aachen, FRG
KLAIJ, M.C.; SERAFINI, P.G. (1988): The potential impact of the use of animal traction on millet-based cropping systems in the sahel. Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
KLAPP, E. (1967): Lehrbuch des Acker-und Pflanzenbaues. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin (West), Hamburg, FRG
KLINGENSTEINER, P. (1987): Personal information
KPPEN, W. (1931): Grundri der Klimakunde. Berlin, Deutschland
KRAUSE, R.; KNICHEL, W. (1986): Entwicklung, Bau und Verbreitung eines Universal-Ackergertes (UAG) -
MULTITRAC (berregional). Marktstudie Brasilien. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG (unpublished)
KRAUSE, R.; LORENZ, F. (1984): Bodenbearbeitung in den Tropen und Subtropen. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
KRAUSE, R.; LORENZ, F.; HOOGMOED, W.B. (1984): Soil Tillage in the Tropics and Subtropics. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
KURBJUWEIT, D. (1989): "Ihr bildet Kapitalisten heran". Die Zeit, Nr.22-26.5.1989, FRG
KHNE, G. (1930): Handbuch der Landmaschinentechnik. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Deutschland
LAL, R. (1975): Role of Mulching techniques in Tropical Soil and Water Management. Technical Bull., IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria
LANDSBERG, H.E.; LIPPMANN, H.; PAFFEN, K.H.; TROLL, C. (1966): Weltkarten zur Klimakunde. Dritte Auflage, Springer Verlag, Berlin (West), Heidelberg, FRG, New York, USA
LARACH, J.O.; CARDOSO, A.; CARVALHO, A.P.; HOCHMLLER, D.P.; FASOLO, P.J.; RAUEN, M.J. (1984): Levantamento de Reconhecimentos dos Solos do Estado do Paran. EMBRAPA-SNLCS, SUDESUL, IAPAR, Curitiba, Brazil
LAUER, W. (1985): Das Klima der Tropen und Subtropen. In: REHM, S. (ed.) (1986): Grundlagen des Pflanzenbaues in den Tropen und Subtropen. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, FRG
LAURENTI, A.C. (1985): Estrutura agrria do municpio de Rio Azul, diagnstico preliminar voltado ao direcionamento das aoes de pesquisa agrcola no PRORURAL. IAPAR, Boletim Tcnico, 77p., Londrina, Brazil
LAWSON, L. T. (1988): Les Contraintes de la Culture Attelee Observee par la Societe Togolaise de Coton (SOTOCO). Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
LE THIEC, G.; BORDET, D. (1988): Etude de deux outils de traction animale visant rduire les contraintes de travail du sol en zones seches. Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 - 12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
LHOSTE, P. (1986): L'utilisation de l'nergie animale en Afrique intertropical. Atelier: Mthodes de la rcherche sur les systmes d'levage en Afrique intertropical. 2-9 Fev. 1986, Mbour, Senegal, IEMVT-CIRAD, Etudes et Synthses, No. 20, Maison-Alfort, France
LHOSTE, P. (1987): L'association agriculture -levage. IEMVT-CIRAD, Etudes et Synthses, No 21, Maison-Alfort, France
LHOSTE, P. (1988): Les projets de developpement de la traction animale: Les contraintes lies l'animal et les voies d'intervention prioritaires. Economie de la Mcanisation en Rgion Chaude. CIRAD/MESRU, 12-16 Sep.1988, Montpellier, France
LINDSAY, F.J. (1986): An introduction to working animals. MPW Australia, Melbourne, Australia LO, M. (1988): Personal information
MAC ARTHUR, J. D. (1980): Some characteristics of farming in a tropical environment. In: Ruthenberg, H. (1980): Farming Systems in the Tropics. 3. Auflage, Clerendon Press, Oxford, UK
MACK, R.P. (1985): Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung der Arbeitseignung von Zugochsen der Lokalrasse und F1-Kreuzungstieren am tropischen Standort Bangladesh. TU Berlin, Inst. f. Tierproduktion, Dissertationsarbeit, Berlin (West)
MACK, R.P.; WENIGER, J.H.; et al. (1987): Untersuchungen ber die Arbeitseignung von Zugochsen der lokalen Rasse und F1-Kreuzungstieren in Bangladesh. Sonderdruck: Zeitschrift fr Tierzchtung und Zchtungsbiologie Bd. 104 (1-2): 96112, Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg, FRG
MANTOVANI, E.C. (1986): Implementos agrcolas desenvolvidos pelo Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Milho e Sorgo. In: Traao animal nas regioes Sudeste e Centro-Oeste. EMBRATER, Brasilia, Brazil
MARQUES, J.Q.A.; BERTONI, J. (1961): Sistemas de preparo do solo em relaao produao e erosao.Bragantia 20: 1144-1181
MARZOUK-SCHMITZ, Y. (1984): Instruments aratoires, systmes de cultures et diffrenciation intra-ethnique. In:Les instruments aratoires en Afrique tropicale. Orstom, Paris, France
MATTHIES, H.J. (ed.) (1987): Die Entwicklung des landwirtschaftlichen Maschinenwesens in Deutschland. Reprint der Ausgabe von 1910. VDI-Verlag, Dsseldorf, FRG
MEIER, H. (1987): Personal information
METZGER, M. (1988): Personal information
MIDHOE, K.; HECHT, H. (1982): Technologietransfer im Bereich Agrartechnik. Teilprojekt Anpassung von Agrartechnologien. Arbeitszeitstudien und Mechanisierungsmodelle in kleinbuerlichen Betrieben in To go/Westafrika. Inst. f. Landtechnik, Justus-Liebig-Universitt, Gieen; GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
MINISTERE DE LA COOPERATION (1975): Manuel de culture avec traction animale. France
MINISTERE DE LA COOPERATION (1984): Memento de l'agronome. Troisime dition, France
MONEGAT, C. (1985): O plantio direto no Estado de Santa Catarina. Anais do 3. encontro nacional de plantio direto. Ponta Grossa, Brazil
MONEGAT, C. (1988): Personal information
MORRISON, B. (1951): Feeds and feeding. A handbook for the students and stockman. 21. edition, Morrison Publishing Company, New York, USA
MUNGROOP, R. (1988): Personal information
MUNZINGER, P. (ed.) (1981): Handbuch der Zugtiernutzung in Afrika. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
MLLER-SMANN, K.M. (1986): Bodenfruchtbarkeit und standortgerechte Landwirtschaft. Manahmen und Methoden im Tropischen Pflanzenbau. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
NELLES, K. (1988): Mglichkeiten und Probleme der Zugtiernutzung in der Zentralregion Malawis. Bericht anllich einer Hospitation im Projekt "Frderung der Viehzucht in Malawi". GTZ, Eschborn, FRG (unpublished)
NELLES, K. (1989): Mglichkeiten und Probleme der Zugtiernutzung in der Zentralregion Malawis. Diplomarbeit, Institut fr Tierproduktion, TU Berlin, Berlin (West) (unpublished)
NEUNHUSER, P. (1984): Personal information
NICOU, R. (1972): Synthse des tudes de physique du sol realis par l'IRAT en Afrique Tropicale Sche. Seminar on Tropical Soil Research. 19pp, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria
NOHLEN, D. (1989): Lexikon Dritte Welt. Rowohl
Taschenbuchverlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg, FRG
NOHLEN, D.; NUSCHELER, F. (1982): Handbuch der Dritten Welt. Bd. 4 Westafrika und Zentralafrika, Verlag Hoffmann und Campe, Hamburg, FRG
NORRIS, E.G. (1987): Sisyphean Labours -Ahistoricity and the failure of development aid -A case history from Togo. Vortrag im Inst. f. Ethnologie, FU Berlin 1987, Vortragsmanuskript, Mnster, FRG (unpublished)
NSING, J. (1989): Personal information
ORSTOM (1984): Les Instruments Aratoire en Afrique Tropicale. Vol.10, No.3-4, dition de l'ORSTOM, Paris, France
PERSOONS, C. (1988): Problmatique d'une tude sur la motorisation intermdiaire au Mali et premires observations. Economie de la Mcanisation en Rgion Chaude. CIRAD/MESRU, 12-16 Sep. 1988, Montpellier, France
PES (1988): L'Emploi de la Culture Attele dans la Rgion Centrale. Atakpame, Togo
PHILLIPS, R.E., PHILLIPS, S.H. (1984): No-tillage agriculture, principles and practices. 306pp., Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, USA
PINGALI, P.; BIGOT, Y.; BINSWANGER, H.P. (1987): Agricultural Mechanization and the Evolution of Farming Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. A World Bank Publication, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA
POCTHIER, G. (1988): Personal information
PREUSCHEN, G. (1951): Die Technik im landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart, FRG
PROPTA (1985): Situation actuelle de la Traction Animale au Togo. Atakpame, Togo
PROPTA (1987): Force Animal No.1 Juli 1987; Bulletin Technique; Fiche Technique No.1, 2, 3, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14. Atakpame, Togo
RAMASWAMY, N.S. (1981): Report on Draught Animal Power as a Source of Renewable Energy. FAO, Rome, Italy (unpublished)
RAMASWAMY, N.S. (1986): Draught animal power in the Third World. In: LINDSAY, F.J. (1986): An introduction to working animals. MPW Australia, Melbourne, Australia
RAMOS, M.C.F. (1987): Personal information
REH, I. (1981): Tierhaltung und Veterinrwesen. In: MUNZINGER, P. (ed.) (1981): Handbuch der Zugtiernutzung in Afrika. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
REH, I. (1982): Zur Bedeutung der Rindfleischerzeugung als Nebenprodukt der Zugrinderhaltung in kleinbuer lichen Betrieben Westafrikas, dargestellt am Beispiel der Region Sine-Saloum in Senegal. TU Berlin, Inst. f. Tierproduktion, Dissertationsarbeit, Berlin (West)
REIS, O.G.; BARON, V. (1986): A mecanizaa ~o agrcola traa ~o animal no Brasil. In: EMBRATER (1986b): Catlogo de fabricantes. Mquinas e implementos agrcolas. Braslia, Brazil
ROCKENBACH, O.C. (1987): Personal information
ROCKWOOD, W.G.; LAL, R. (1974): Mulch tillage: a technique for soil and water conservation in the tropics. Span 17 (2): 77-79
ROTH, C.H. (1986-1989): Personal information
RUTHENBERG, H. (1980): Farming Systems in the Tropics. 3. Auflage, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK
RUTHENBERG, H.; ANDREAE, B. (1982): Landwirtschaftliche Betriebssysteme in den Tropen und Subtropen. In: von Blankenburg, P. (ed.) (1982): Handbuch der Landwirtschaft und Ernhrung in Entwicklungslnder. Band 1, 2. Auflage, pp125-173, Stuttgart, FRG
SANCHEZ, P.A. (1976): Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics. Wiley, New York, USA
SCHMITZ, H.: Mulchsaat in Klein-und Mittelbetrieben. Anstze in Sdbrasilien. Entwicklung und lndlicher Raum, 22 (5), 14-17, 1988
SCHOLZ, U. (1984): Ist die Agrarproduktion der Tropen kologisch benachteiligt? Geographische Rundschau 36, No. 7: 361-366
SCHULTZ-KLINKEN, K.-R. (1981): Haken, Pflug und Ackerbau. August Lax Verlagsbuchhandlung, Hildesheim, FRG
SCHWARTZ, H.J. (1987a): Personal information
SCHWARTZ, H.J. (1987b): Nutzungsformen spezieller Tierarten -Kameliden. TU Berlin, Inst. f Tierproduktion, Verlesungsskript, Berlin (West)
SEGLER, G. (1956): Maschinen in der Landwirtschaft. Parey Verlag, Hamburg, FRG und Berlin (West)
SENE, M. (1988): Le travail la dent en traction bovine pour une meilleure infiltration des eaux des premires pluies sur sols grvillonnaires en bordure de plateaux: C.R. de Kaymor. Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
SHAW, L.N.; KROMER, K.H. (1987): Revolving spade planter soil opener. ASAE, 1987 Summer Meeting, Baltimore,USA
SIQUEIRA, R.; YAMAOKA, R.; CASAO JUNIOR, R.; ARAUJO, A.G.; FIGUEIREDO, P.R.A. (1986): Projeto de desenvolvimento de equipamentos traao animal para o Estado do Paran. XV Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Agrcola 8-12/7/1986, Sao Paulo, Brazil
SORRENSON, W.J.; Montoya, L.J. (1984): Economic implications of soil erosion and soil conservation practices in Paran, Brasil. Convnio IAPAR/GTZ. IAPAR, Londrina, Brazil
SOTOCO (1987): La Culture Attele dans les Savanes, Situation, Structure des Exploitations, Fonctionnement.
SOTOCO, Atakpame, Togo
STARKEY, P. (1981): Farming with Work Oxen in Sierra Leone. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Tower Hill, Freetown, Sierra Leone
STARKEY, P. (1986a): The introduction, intensification and diversification of the use of animal power in West African farming systems. Implications at farm level. In: STARKEY, P, NDIAME, F. (1988) Animal Power in Farming Systems. GATE/GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
STARKEY, P. (1986b): Draught animal power in Africa. Priorities for development, research and liaison. Farming Systems Support Project (FSSP), Networking Paper No. 14, Washington, USA
STARKEY, P. (1988a): Animal-Drawn Wheeled Toolcarriers: Perfected yet rejected. GATE/GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
STARKEY, P. (1988b): Animal Traction Directory: Africa. GATE/GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
STARKEY, P. (1989): Harnessing and Implements for Animal Traction. GATE/GTZ, Eschborn, FRG (im Druck)
STARKEY, P.; APETOFIA, K. (1986): Integrated livestock systems in Nepal and Indonesia. Implications for animal traction programs in West Africa. Farming Systems Support Project (FSSP), Network Report No. 3, Washington,USA
STARKEY, P.; NDIAME, F. (eds.) (1988): Animal Power in Farming Systems. GATE/GTZ, Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden
STATISTISCHES BUNDESAMT (1985): Lnderbericht Senegal 1985. Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart und Mainz, FRG
STATISTISCHES BUNDESAMT (1987): Lnderbericht Senegal 1987. Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart und Mainz, FRG
STATISTISCHES BUNDESAMT (1988): Lnderbericht Brasilien. Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Mainz, FRG
STATISTISCHES BUNDESAMT (1981): Lnderbericht Togo. Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Mainz, FRG
STED (1988): Usure du Matriel de Culture Attele. Togo
STEINER, K.G. (1984): Intercropping in Tropical Smallholder Agriculture with Special Reference to West Africa. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
STRUBENHOFF, H.-W. (1988): Probleme des bergangs von der Handhacke zum Pflug. Eine konomische Analyse der Einfhrung der tierischen Anspannung in Ackerbausysteme Togos. Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk, Kiel, FRG
TCHOUGOUNE, M. (1988): Les Contraintes dans l'Utilisation de la Traction Animal. Third Regional Workshop Animal Traction for Agricultural Development in West Africa, 7 -12 July, 1988, Saly, Senegal
TROUSE, A.C. (1979): Soil physical characteristics and root
growth. In: LAL, R.; GREENLAND, D.J. (eds.): Soil Physical Properties and Crop
Production in the Tropics. Wiley, pp319-325, Chichester
UPROMA (1986): Catalogue et Tarif. Kara, Togo
VALENTIN, P.; SPITTLER, G. (1976): Mglichkeiten der Ochsenanspannung unter den Gesichtspunkten einer integrierten Viehhaltung in Westafrika. AFC Agriculture and Food, Duisburg, FRG
VICENTE-CHANDLER, J. et al. (1966): High crop yields produced wih or without tillage on three typical soils of the humid mountains of Puerto Rico. J.Agr.Univ.Puerto Rico 50: 146-150
VIEBIG, U. (1981): Grundlagen der Anspannungs-und Gertetechnik. In: MUNZINGER, P.: Handbuch der Zugtiernut zung in Afrika. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
VIEBIG, U. (1982): Grundlagen der Anspannungs-und Gertetechnik. (English Text) In: MUNZINGER, P.: Animal Traction in Africa. GTZ, Eschborn, FRG
VIEBIG, U. (1988): Personal information
VIEIRA, C. (1985): O feijao em cultivos consorciados. Universidade Federal de Viosa, Viosa, Brazil
VIEIRA, M.J. (1987): Solos de baixa aptidao agrcola. Opoes de uso e tcnicas de manejo e conservaao.
IAPAR, Circular No.51, Londrina, Brazil
WALTER, H. (1979): Vegetation und Klimazonen. Stuttgart, FRG
WALTER, S. (1990): Nicht-chemische Unkrautregulierung. Stiftung kologischer Landbau (SL), Bad Drkheim, FRG
WEISCHET, W. (1984): Agrarwirtschaft in den feuchten Tropen. Geografische Rundschau 36, No. 7, pp. 344-351
WENIGER, J.H.; SCHNEICHEL, M. (1986): Rinder-und Bffelhaltung auf dem indischen Subkontinent. TU Berlin, Inst. f. Tierproduktion, Vorlesungsskript, Berlin (West)
WERTH, M. (1987): Prokektfortschrittskontrolle 1987 zum Projekt "Entwicklung der Zentralregion Togo". Institut fr Entwicklungsforschung, Wirtschafts-und Sozialplanung, Saarbrcken und Bonn, FRG
WESTNEAT, A.S.; KLUTSE, A., AMEGBETO, K.N. (1988): Features of Animal Traction Adoption in Togo. In: Starkey, P. und Ndiame, F. (eds.): Animal Power in Farming Systems. GATE/GTZ, Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, FRG
WIENEKE, F., FRIEDRICH, T. (1983): Agrartechnik in den Tropen. DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., FRG
WIJEWARDENE, R.; WAIDYANATHA, P. (1984): Conservation Farming. For small farmers in the humid tropics. Dept. of Agric., Peradenia, Sri Lanka
YU, C.M. (1988): Sistema Faxinal. Uma forma de organizaao camponesa em desagregaao no Centro-Sul do Paran. IAPAR, Bol. Tc. No.22, Londrina, Brazil
YU, C.M.; SEREIA, V.J. (1989): Tipificaao e caracterizaao dos produtores do Estado do Paran. Londrina, Brazil (unpublished)
ZWEIER, K. (1986): Women can handle draught oxen, too. In:
Draught animal power. GATE/GTZ, Eschborn,